The Doctor will see you now Professor Ramos Blog

Voluntary Euthanasia Should Be Allowed

Human killing has been a debatable issue throughout the years. Willful extermination, the demonstration of murdering somebody effortlessly which will straightforwardly choose one’s passing, is unavoidably dubious. Contentions contradicting willful extermination as a rule incorporates that it is a sort of homicide, which can never be permitted. In any case, killing will undoubtedly be murder, for it tends to be sorted into different structures, including latent, dynamic, deliberate and automatic ones (Bonin, 2012). Among them, deliberate willful extermination is clearly not murder.Voluntary killing, which can be characterized as a critically ill individual deciding to take his own life when experiences serious torment however is intellectually able, ought to sensibly be authorized. In this paper, two reasons supporting the intentional killing will be given and two counter contentions will be invalidated. Two reasons of why intentional killing ought to be sanctioned can be perce ived. Right off the bat, kicking the bucket calmly with nobility is the best decision for the enduring incurables.The individual led intentional killing is destined to be at death's door, which implies that he makes certain to pass on soon and can just pick the best approach to pass on, the route in very agony or the effortless way. It is normally better for him to decide to kick the bucket effortlessly. Permitting an individual to kick the bucket calmly without torment is to regard his life, and he can even now keep his last poise. In any case in the event that it is illicit to have willful killing, the patient must be tormented by the terrible torment, attempting to inhale, wishing to have a prompt alleviation yet at the same time need to sit tight for a tragic death.Secondly, the choice of the patient ought to be regarded. As indicated by the definition, the patient who can be directed the intentional killing is intellectually equipped, which implies that he can settle on his own objective choices (Chand, 2009). The patient is answerable for his own life, and the choice about death probably been considered genuinely. No one needs incredible the torment isn't amazingly agonizing, so when he decides to pass on, it implies that this decision is unquestionably the just a single he can bear.In such cases, no one aside from the patient himself can feel that he is so troubled to live, and how energetic he needs beyond words. In what capacity can individuals choose for somebody when they know nothing about the circumstance he is in? In this manner, it's not possible for anyone to choose whether he should live on or not aside from the patient himself. The choice of the patient is the one in particular that matters and matters. On the off chance that the choice of surrendering the treatment can be normal and permitted, for what reason can't intentional willful extermination be? There are a few counterarguments on this issue which contradict deliberate euthanasia.Firs tly, a few people guarantee that specialists ought not exact demise (Somerville, 2010). Be that as it may, while thinking about deliberate willful extermination, it isn't to â€Å"inflict† passing, however to make demise progressively tolerable when the demise is inescapable. The facts confirm that specialists are for mending as opposed to murdering, however when there is no greater chance to recuperate any longer, to ease the patients’ torment perhaps increasingly significant for a specialist just as for the patients. Also, a few adversaries cited from the constitution of the USA, which says that everybody has the option to life, freedom and security of individual (Bonin, 2012).They contend that regardless of whether the patient is critically ill, his entitlement to life should in any case be ensured and he can just kick the bucket normally. Be that as it may, these individuals overlook that the privilege to life doesn't imply that an individual ought to be compelled to live, in any event, when he experiences insufferable agony and has no plan to recoup. The privilege to life implies that an individual has the option to pick the method of the life, including the passing. For different types of willful extermination, for example, the automatic killing, the patient’s right to life might be harmed as the choice of killing may not be made by the patient.However, with respect to deliberate killing, it is simply the patient who decides to live incredible, relies just upon his own choice. Consequently, intentional killing doesn't do harms to the patient’s rights. Rather, the sanctioning of deliberate killing will be valuable for patients to practice their â€Å"right to life† better. All in all, intentional killing is appropriate to be sanctioned, as a result of the pride of the patients and the regard towards the patients’ own decisions.The authorization of deliberate willful extermination will neither harm people’s rights, nor hurt the specialists. It is genuinely sensible to make it authorized. References: Bonin, A. (2012). Human Euthanasia, The Debate: The Arguments for Both Sides. Recovered on March tenth, 2013, from http://www. inspector. com/article/human-willful extermination the-banter the-contentions for-both-sides Chand, K. (2009). Why we should make willful extermination lawful. Recovered on March thirteenth, 2013, from http://www. gatekeeper. co. uk/society/joepublic/2009/jul/01/willful extermination helped s

The Eight Essentials of Innovation

The Eight Essentials of Innovation In a world that is rocked by the constant threat of change as technology grows at an unprecedented rate, innovation has become a buzzword everywhere, particularly in the business world.Any company that is not prioritizing innovation is preparing to get run over or swallowed by the competition.The case of IBM getting surpassed by Microsoft and Apple offers a good example of how important innovation is.A related buzzword is “disruption”, which refers to the changes wrought upon an industry, market, or company by new technology or a younger company coming into the market with a revolutionary way of doing things.Companies are right to fear disruption. Entire businesses have fallen by the wayside due to not innovating fast enough.The only way for a company to sidestep disruption is by being one step ahead of the rest.The company should take innovation seriously, invest in research and development, and keep an eye on what its competitors are doing to avoid being out-innovated. Innovati on is particularly challenging for huge, well established companies, whose success is typically driven by established ways of doing things and optimization of existing business rather than innovation and game-changing creativity.So, how can established companies that want to remain ahead of the curve embrace creativity?In this article, we are going to look at the 8 essentials of innovation that every company should keep in mind: Source: McKinsey1. ASPIRATIONTo innovate, the company must first acknowledge that innovation is absolutely critical for growth.This is not always the case in many companies.Old ways of thinking and doing things dominate in many companies, causing them to perpetually lag behind, only adopting what others have already moved on from when it becomes inconvenient to continue using the old methods.Such companies have already failed at the first step: acknowledging the necessity of innovation and then developing cascaded targets to reflect this.It is not enough to accept that innovation is important. The company also has to demonstrate this in action by planning for it.The main way a company shows its commitment to a certain course of action is in the plans it makes.For instance, having a budget for RD indicates that the company is serious about innovation.Innovation is inspired by clear goals and targets. When a company has a big, hairy, audacious goal (“BHAG”) to chase after, it will stop at nothing to attain it.For instance, J. F. Kennedy’s directive that America should “put a man on the moon” was responsible for the immense innovation that led to exactly that outcome: a man walked on the moon.However, merely communicating a compelling vision is not enough.The company should craft an innovation aspiration that answers the following question: “how much innovation does the company require to meet its financial growth objectives?In other words, the innovation goals should be quantifiable. While a handful of companies incorporate this in their strategy and planning processes, most do not.When the innovation aspiration is quantified, a manager can make appropriate trade-offs that will ensure innovation takes place alongside the rest of the business activities.This is a company that walks its talk, unlike one where the CEO announces the company’s focus on innovation but other business activities dominate as usual in resource allocation.The best innovators b reak down their lofty aspirations into specific targets: “What exactly should we do to put a man on the moon?”The targets should have both quantitative and qualitative metrics.The targets should be cascaded throughout the organization. It should also be clear who will be involved in innovation and what specific aspects of the overall goal they are tasked with delivering.2. CHOICEThe second component of innovation concerns opportunity.Organizations should find out where the best market opportunities currently and potentially in the future are located.These market opportunities are known as innovation marketspaces.They are the boundaries within which a company will look for the insights it needs to unlock new forms of value. The boundaries may be business-model parameters, technical limits, or other constraints.The innovation investment choices the company makes should align with its long-term strategy. Ideally, these investments should form the foundation for the organization’s future growth.Company leaders often have to grapple with these tough choices, asking themselves questions like: “Is this technology going to have the impact we think it will?” “Is it going to work or will we lose money?” These questions can erode confidence.This uncertainty leads to procrastination in decision-making, which is lethal, given that younger, smaller, leaner competitors are probably not second-guessing themselves as much as the bigger companies (who have more to lose if they make the wrong bet).This uncertainty is most common during moments of industry transition, when it is absolutely crucial that the company makes the right bet/investment, exploring the innovations that are emerging around its core business.Decision makers in the company should sharpen their ability to recognize change signals and figure out which upcoming scenarios are most likely to increase positive outcomes and investment confidence.Another aspect of choice in innovation is portfolio manag ement.This refers to the company’s ability to evaluate and prioritize projects. Highly innovative companies understand what the competition or potential disruptors are working on.After a rigorous assessment of the expected risk, timing, and value of the different initiatives, these companies are able to figure out which innovations to invest in and at what ratio.Successful portfolio management usually involves bringing in people with the relevant experience and decision-making authority to discuss the projects/innovation pipeline.In many cases, innovation pipelines are filled with incremental projects rather than breakthrough innovations, mainly because of decision-makers allocating resources to their own passions when they are not checked by input from those who have relevant expertise.3. DISCOVERYDiscovery is about taking an introspective look at the current reality of the market and extrapolating a potential future reality from that.In other words, examine the existing context and imagine the most possible future scenarios, whether best case or worst case.Discovery requires intuition, observation, and inspiration, working within the selected innovation space and developing the most critical problems the company should focus on going forward.Uncovering actionable insights and identifying the problems worth solving requires skill and experience. Discovery involves merging different areas of knowledge in a creative, imaginative yet practical way.For this examination, there are three different lenses that decision-makers should use: technology, market/customer, and business.The technology lens is about the feasibility of new technology and the benefits to be gained from adopting it. Adopting the right technology will give your business a competitive advantage in the market.Technology affects all spheres of innovation, including products, services, business models, and processes.Most people think of software when someone mentions technology, but it could just as well be a service platform. Unfortunately, many companies have a narrow definition of technology.The technology lens enables the company to identify the future possibilities arising from new ways of doing things.These possibilities can bring about threats or opportunities, and it is up to the company to identify what each possibility means and how they can best react to it.The market lens enables the company to identify the preferences of its customers.Customer wants and tastes are ever evolving, and sometimes companies fail because they didn’t notice the change in their customers’ tastes â€" or they noticed, but did not make the appropriate adjustments to accommodate the changes.Understanding customer preferences requires a careful observation of their behavior â€" this is the importance of customer data.The business lens concerns the competitive context within which the company is operating, and the current economic conditions.Examining these realities enables the company t o competitively position itself in the value chain.When a company gains a good understanding of its relative market position and the flow of profits in its industry, it can make better innovation investment decisions.The company should go a step further and try to get a grasp of the developments in the competitive landscape, which includes any potentially disruptive emerging business models.The business lens also considers the regulatory regimes and the influence they have on the profits and positioning of firms in the industry.4. EVOLUTIONEvolution is the aspect that protects the company from disruption.A good slogan that perfectly encapsulates the need for evolution is “evolve or die”.For many businesses, this has become an all too real threat that they cannot wish away.The biggest fear among most chief strategy officers is that of new entrants coming into the market and disrupting the established way of doing things with process innovations and disruptive technologies.Product innovation is not enough to protect your company from competitors, not in this era.Other factors like business models and business processes must also undergo evolution and improvement for the company to maintain a competitive advantage â€" or even just to survive.Business model innovation is the kind of innovation that yields the most significant long-term value. An example of this is introducing new distribution and production methods.An innovative business model will disrupt the current paradigm and also impose powerful barriers to competition.For instance, when Coca-Cola realized that traditional distribution models such as trucks do not work well in the emerging urban areas of Africa, it partnered with local entrepreneurs who operate manual distribution centers (MDCs) â€" in this case, bikes and pushcarts.This gave Coca-Cola an edge over other beverage companies in the region.Ideally, companies should test new models before adopting them.Pilot projects and experimentation is n ecessary because it reveals whether a model will work and the problems that might be encountered once the new model is implemented.Experimentation also enables the company to make the best decisions, particularly on where to allocate resources.Amazon is highly skilled at constantly evolving and diversifying its business model.While retail is still the company’s core business, Amazon has improved billing options, added features for recommendation and personalization, and introduced other functions which enhance the customer’s experience.5. ACCELERATIONIf you are putting serious effort in innovation, your competition probably is too.Multiple companies can come up with the same innovation at the same time.In such a situation, the most likely winner of the race is the fastest mover â€" for instance, in filing critical patents and in bringing their product to the market.Having a first-mover advantage accrues benefits such as customer loyalty, brand recognition, and distribution or ma nufacturing scale.In some industries, having the first-mover advantage produces a winner-takes-all situation where the leader is able to capture anywhere between 50 and 100 percent of the market.For fast acceleration, the company should ask itself this question during the development process: what barriers stand between its great idea and the end-user?Internal barriers include lack of resources or functional silos.External barriers include unwillingness by partners and suppliers to support the intended innovation.In many cases, companies have developed overly elaborate “funnel” processes that involve committees which have to meet again and again to discuss and make decisions. In the process of going through the funnel, the idea gets watered down, losing its innovativeness.By the time end-users or customers are interacting with it, the end product is no longer the revolutionary, disruptive thing it was intended to be.To maintain high levels of innovativeness, the development proc ess should ensure that the end-users test the idea early on â€" that is before corporate dilution ruins it.Furthermore, the development team must maintain full focus on the customer value proposition throughout the process.Acceleration requires a strong project management team led by a capable project manager.Where there are multiple innovation teams, they should be structured in a cross-functional way, not just in paper but in reality. Cross-functional teams enable better work coordination under the authority of one leader.The members of an innovation team should dedicate either their full time or half of their time to the innovation project.This fosters a culture where the members are able to prioritize the success of the project over the success of their own function as a contributor.Cross-functional project teams should be co-located â€" that is they should operate in the same physical space.This makes co-ordination a reality, not just an ideal on paper.6. SCALINGFrom the very b eginning, the company must keep in mind the possibility of scaling its innovation.The ability to function at scale must therefore be designed into the core architecture of the innovation.For instance, at the time of Facebook’s launch in the US, a similar social networking startup known as Hyves was already in existence in the Netherlands. Both companies gained dominance in their local markets rapidly.Facebook attracted a lot of funds which helped fuel its constant innovation. Hyves’ growth on the other hand plateaued.The reason is that the architecture and set-up of Hyves was not designed to scale-up to several markets outside Holland which feature diverse languages and internet ecosystems.Meanwhile, Facebook became firmly established as a dominant player that was impossible to beat.Note, however, that not every innovative concept should be implemented at a global scale. The company should figure out the appropriate scale or reach of their idea. This will ensure it invests the a ppropriate amount of resources in it.Figuring out the appropriate scale also helps determine the amount of risk the company will face in implementing the idea. Stretched beyond its natural boundary, any idea will fail.On the other hand, there are some ideas that are successful only at large scale.In such a case, the company has to make a big bet â€" if not, it should invest its resources elsewhere.This point is well illustrated by the emergence of “winner-takes-all” digital businesses.7. EXTENDThe world is changing, and not just in adopting new technology, but also in new ways of thinking and doing things.For instance, innovation in a company has always been assumed to be a thing that should originate from the RD (research and development) department.However, things are changing, and organizations have begun to open their doors with the intention of spurring innovation.Thanks to the rapid pace of technological advancement and to globalization and lower capital economies, a unive rsity student can today create a multibillion-dollar innovation that disrupts industries.When companies extend their reach beyond the walls of the organization in looking for innovation partners, they can get greater returns on their investments. Collaborating with external partners is one of the established methods companies use to cut costs.Such collaborations also ensure the company gets the product faster to the market.Companies should learn to co-create with its business partners, and crowd source from its customers and other stakeholders as this can yield opportunities for more value to be extracted from the innovation investments.This is easier said than done. For many companies, this requires a shift in the company’s collective mindset.Such companies must learn to welcome ideas that come from elsewhere without any bias against innovations not developed in-house.It is worth noting that useful innovations do not always appear useful when you first look at them. Ideas should therefore not be dismissed too quickly.It is even rarer for companies to find exactly what they need or want from an external source.As a result, companies will need to tightly manage their interfaces with the external innovation community.In most cases, what is said by the external sources needs to be translated for the internal development team to accept it and use it.Companies must devote processes and resources towards the management of ideas flowing from outside.The company must also create formal and informal partnerships that will help ensure the organization has a steady pipeline of ideas.By forging strategic networks, companies can ensure a steady supply of novel perspectives, insights and ideas. Such networks include connecting with think tanks, universities, and research institutes.8. MOBILIZATIONIt’s all well and good to aspire for innovation, but these aspirations and plans must be turned into actual action.Mobilization is aptly captured by the Thomas Edison quote tha t innovation requires 1 percent inspiration and 99 percent perspiration.The point is that the company must put in effort to create a culture of innovation.The desire for innovation may be held by the company’s top management, but it will require considerable effort to get everyone else in the company to adopt the pro-innovation approach.Company executives have the responsibility of creating a culture and environment that stimulates the intense, long, tedious work that is often required to create something innovative.Of all the essentials of innovation, having committed leadership is the most important. It is also the best predictor of innovation success.It is the leadership’s job to motivate the entire organization and provide the tools different people need to contribute to the work of innovation.One way of motivating employees to adopt a culture of innovation is through corporate innovation competitions.The company should have dedicated innovation resources which can act as a catalyst that motivates the entire organization.An example of such dedicated resources is an innovation team at the business-unit level, whose task is to frame opportunities and come up with new value propositions based on the market and on insights developed from observing customer behavior.There should be very clear roles and responsibilities in the company where the innovation agenda is concerned. Everyone should understand his/her expected contribution to creating innovation.Of course not everyone at the company will be directly involved with the innovation project. Those who are directly involved require meaningful incentives and rewards.The company must ensure the right people are working in the right positions and foster a supportive culture that encourages them to give their best.Every innovation needs at least one top management sponsor.This will ensure the idea as implemented by the team does not lose sight of the big picture.Employees in the lower levels of the company ma y tend to focus on their area of expertise alone.The top management sponsor, if he/she has done his/her homework, can see with clarity all the aspects of the idea and how they fit together and will give good advice to the team to ensure success.WRAPPING UPDisruption is a constant threat today, even when you think your company is safe.Consider that many disruptive companies such as Apple and Amazon were started in their founders’ garages.This means you have no idea who is out there working on the next big thing.Therefore, every company should put a lot of focus on innovation, unless it is comfortable with playing fiddle to competitors who are more innovative.It is not enough to experiment and call that “innovation”. In a world where everyone else is prioritizing innovation, particularly the industry leaders, companies must be smart about innovation.The 8 essentials listed here provide a useful structure for thinking about innovation.They ensure a company covers all the importan t elements in its pursuit of innovation.

What Is the Chemistry Glossary Definition of Electrode

Movie Review Star Wars - 1848 Words

When George Lucas first pitched the idea of Star Wars, a space-western, to movie executives back in the 1970’s; he probably never imagined it to be the cultural phenomenon that it turned out to be. The original Star Wars trilogy (Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi), earned more two billion dollars, after adjusted for inflation in North America (IMDB). Then sixteen years later the next three Star Wars movies were released (Star Wars Episode I: The Phantom Menace, Star Wars Episode II: Attack of the Clones, Star Wars Episode III: Revenge of the Sith), and earned more than 1.5 billion dollars at the box office in North America, adjusted for inflation (IMDB). Not only were the movies box office hits, the movies were also critically acclaimed. Episode VI was nominated for 11 Oscars: including Best Picture, and also won seven Oscars, including a special achievement award (The Academy Awards). The prequels were also nominated for a total of five Academy Awards (The Academy Awards). With all of that aside Star Wars is more than all of that, the franchise has influenced movies and how audiences get involved with movies. Star Wars was not the original blockuster, Episode IV came out two years late to get that title, that title goes to Jaws. Jaws, much like Star Wars, caused the shift from the film industries typical, personal filmmaking, to a much faster paced, big budget movies, aimed towardsShow MoreRelatedMovie Review : Star Wars1214 Words   |  5 Pagesnew toy? In this Duracell commercial a young boy receives a toy light saber like the ones used in Star Wars. As the boy opens up the box to his new light saber, he finds that batteries are not included. He then races upstairs to his bedroom and finds Duracell batteries. After putting in the Duracell batteries into his Star Wars Light Saber, suddenly his whole house and neighborhood turns into a Star Wars battlefield. This Du racell commercial was aired on television on October 30, 2015. This was a greatRead MoreMovie Review : Star Wars1544 Words   |  7 Pagesfilm-inspired games usually appear the afterthought of the Hollywood marketing process. But Star Wars: the Force Awakens isn’t a fairly large franchise film, and these are by no means normal circumstances. A little under a month ahead of what could quite possibly be the biggest cinematic release of all time, we fans have not just a shameless tie-in but a fully-fledged reboot of one of the most loved franchises in Star Wars’ enormous gaming catalogue. And while that may be as much a result of rose-tinted nostalgiaRead MoreReview Of Movie Star Wars 1472 Words   |  6 PagesHunter Keane Dr. Jarrod Whitaker Ritual Studies October 5, 2015 Untitled Jedi Paper When George Lucas released Star Wars in 1977, it would be reasonable to assume he possessed some level of expectations regarding how his film saga would affect and alter the lives of its audience. What he may not have anticipated, however, is that his fictional protagonists, the Jedi Order, and their respective philosophies would resonate so strongly within particular individuals to such an extent that itRead MoreMovie Review : Star Wars1971 Words   |  8 PagesStar Wars has become an American classic in pop culture. George Lucas is the brilliant mind behind the movie who came up with all of what we call now Star Wars. He is the creator of such a brilliant phenomenon in the pop culture. He could not do this all by himself, there were many people involved in the production of the movies. An essential factor to the production of the movies is the music. Lucas decided to give that responsibility to John Williams, a well-known composer, because he had listenRead MoreMovie Rev iew : Star Wars2035 Words   |  9 Pagesthe idea of Star Wars, a space-western, to movie executives back in the 1970’s; I’m sure he never imagined it to be the cultural phenomenon that it turned out to be. The original Star Wars trilogy (Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope, Star Wars Episode V: The Empire Strikes Back, Star Wars Episode VI: Return of the Jedi), earned more two billion dollars, after adjusted for inflation in North America (1). Then sixteen years later the next three Star Wars movies were released (Star Wars Episode I: TheRead MoreFrancis Ford Coppola, The Visionary Director Of The Godfather Essay1067 Words   |  5 Pagessubtlety and tension. If Joss Whedon is the new Francis Ford Coppola, then the movie industry must be in major trouble right? Wrong, in fact it is booming. And bad directors like Joss Whedon are not just making terrible films. They are polluting our cinemas with rip offs, remakes and reboots. Hollywood no longer seems to care about ma king good movies. They are money driven, bloated and stale. We need to demand more of the movie industry to stop it churning out these unoriginal films. Disney is the biggestRead MoreStar Wars : The Force1090 Words   |  5 PagesStar Wars: The Force Awakens has been a huge success since it hit theaters December 18, 2015. According to Times Magazine, â€Å"the seventh installment in the space saga became the highest grossing film in North America†. Star Wars: The Force Awakens may have some mixed reviews, but no one can deny the numbers. The seventh film made the most out of all of the films, but it may just be due to the already massive fan base. When Disney gained the rights to Star Wars, fans of the universe had mixed feelingsRead MoreMovie Review : A Film Review On High Noon1028 Words   |  5 Pages I have decided to write my film review on High Noon because it is a movie fresh into my mind that I really enjoyed. It is the best movie shown in the class so far. It seems like a movie way ahead of its time for being made in 1952. The exposition was quick and gave us all the info we needed about the characters to move on w ith the story. The rising action was my favorite part of the movie believe it or not. It shows us even more background and Wills struggle to get people to help. Every time heRead MoreWeek 5- Final Film Critique1421 Words   |  6 PagesFINAL FILM CRITIQUE There’s no doubt that Star Wars is one of the most impactful films of all time, having changed the movie-making game ever since it premiered in 1977. It quickly became a global phenomenon and has accumulated some of the most passionate fans in the universe. Star Wars: Episode IV - A New Hope is a great example to use in order to illustrate the properties discussed throughout the course. In this paper, I will analyze the entire movie. To begin, I will start by giving some basicRead MorePorter s Five Forces Framework992 Words   |  4 Pagespublished in Harvard Business Review in 1979. Each industry generates profits, and the industry competes against 5 competitive forces for the profits. If left unchecked, the industry’s entire profits will be siphoned off making it irrelevant economically. Those 5 competitive forces 1. Threat of New Entrants 2. Bargaining Power of Buyers 3. Bargaining Power of Suppliers 4. Threat of Substitution 5. Intensity of Rivalry Threat of New Entrants was little threat to the movie making industry in the previous

Letter to editor Free Essays

After reading the article written by Christopher Stevens about educating Yorkshire I felt I should respond because, although Mr. Stevens clearly reflected upon the real life situations of the school, he still managed to draw attention to the negatives and form Ignorant conclusions whilst Including his Inconsiderate views. He sits back and crestless when It can be said that he must have gone to school what 20 years ago and that times have changed, teachers must know what they’re doing otherwise they wouldn’t have been given the job with such immense responsibility. We will write a custom essay sample on Letter to editor or any similar topic only for you Order Now While he continues to point fingers he ignores how incredible Mr. Burton and Mustards touching Journey has been as well as other uplifting moments in the show. Thrill Community Academy has several different types of characters that attend but in your article you have stereotyped all teenagers. You take some of the scenes from the show and blow them out of proportion and then use that to make assumptions about all teens. Don’t you go out on the street and see ‘Ignorant’ and ‘swaggered’ out kids? Rather than generalizing you should pay close attention to the fact that schools are diverse, that the students and have their own little world, some would even call It their very own bubble. The first thing I’m going to talk about will be base. I think to achieve the perfect base you must go through some important steps prior to applying any makeup to ensure you get a flawless finish. Making sure your skin is clean, exfoliated and moisturizer is key, this will allow the foundation to actually sink in into the skin and make it look like your actual skin. But there’s a step before that, and that’s applying primer, it’ll provide oil free hydration, minimize the appearance of pores and make sure your makeup lasts all day long. When applying foundation, the most Important thing to remember s that less Is more, this’ll even out your skin tone and let your natural skin show through, this’ll leave you looking luminous and Like your skin has a healthy glow. The next step Is concealed, the purpose Is already In the name and that’s to conceal, It’ll make dark circles and imperfections virtually disappear, as well as highlighting under the eyes and making you look more radiant and awake. Next go on to apply powder, this will leave you shine free and make sure your makeup doesn’t slip and slide throughout the day. Brows I think brows are so important, they frame your face and add structure , there’s arioso ways to fill in your brows, pencils, wax, powder and gel, my personal favorite is the had’ brows kit, had stands for high definition , you get four powders in the kit, the colors range from light medium and dark, you should gravitate towards buying the kit according to the color of your hair, you get four powders, they are pigmented and creamy, this allows the shadow to glide through your eyebrows Eyes I think out of all makeup, eye makeup must be my most favorite, one because Its such a creative part and you can get really artistic In looks you can create. Negative apposed to the positives. How to cite Letter to editor, Papers

Kate Chopins Controversial Views Essays (1729 words) -

Kate Chopin's Controversial Views Matchmaker.com: Sign up now for a free trial. Date Smarter! [an error occurred while processing this directive] Kate Chopin's Controversial Views "Too strong a drink for moral babies, and should be labeled 'poison'." was the how the Republic described Kate Chopin's most famous novel The Awakening (Seyersted 174). This was the not only the view of one magazine, but it summarized the feelings of society as a whole. Chopin woke up people to the feelings and minds of women. Even though her ideas were controversial at first, slowly over the decades people began to accept them. Kate O'Flaherty Chopin was raised in St. Louis in the 1850's and 1860's. Chopin had a close relationship with her French grandmother which lead to her appreciation of French writers. When she was only five Chopin's father, Thomas O'Flaherty died leaving her without a father figure. Eliza O'Flaherty, Chopin's mother, was from there on the head of the household. Chopin grew up knowing that women could be strong and intelligent and that they did not have to be submissive creatures (Skaggs 2). She loved her mother and considered her "A woman of great beauty, intelligence, and personal magnetism" (Seyersted 14). Growing up around independent women, however, did not dissuade her from marriage. Her marriage to Oscar Chopin by all accounts was a happy one. Taking on the role of a high society lady as well as wife and new mother, Chopin fit in well with the New Orleans culture. She enjoyed the Louisiana atmosphere so well that most of her writings were based here. Chopin continued living in Louisiana raising her six young children until the sudden death of her husband brought her back to St., Louis (Skaggs 3). Oscar Chopin died while their youngest child, Lelia was only three. Soon after Chopin moved her family to St. Louis to be with her dying mother. In the grief of her losses Chopin had to rediscover who she was. This challenge came out in her writing of heroines searching for self-understanding (Skaggs 3). No longer Eliza O'Flaherty's daughter or Oscar Chopin's wife, Kate Chopin was forced to find a new role for herself. Her new role would be a writer. A few key figures in her life influenced Chopin to write. Doctor Frederick Kolbemheyer was a life long friend on whose support she always relied. Raised in Austria and then exiled for his beliefs, Kolbemheyer was a philosopher and encouraged Chopin to read Darwin, Haxley, and Spencer. Their beliefs were very similar and he must have supported her when she denounced the Catholic religion after her mother's death. The beloved friends wrote to each other often while Chopin was in Louisiana. Seeing the talent in her writing, Kolbemheyer encouraged Chopin to publish her letters. She admired him greatly and even named her son Frederick after him. (Taylor 147). There were three American women writers of the time that Chopin admired. When asked who would be a good model woman writer she responded, "I know of no one better than Miss Jewett to study for technique and nicety of construction. I don't mention Mary E. Wilkins for she is a great genius and genius is not to be studied." (Taylor 163). Wilkins's book Pembroke was condemned by society and Chopin must have been sympathetic when five years later her own book The Awakening was also condemned. Chopin also looked up to Ruth McEnery Stuart and praised her work as being "True to nature," and having a "wholesome human note" (Taylor 163). It is notable that later Chopin's talent and style were to be compared to the works of these women whom she admired. The greatest influence on Chopin was the French writer Guy de Maupassant. Chopin describes Maupassant by writing, "Here was a man who escaped from tradition and authority ... looked out upon life through his own being with his own eyes; and who, in a direct and simple was, told up what he saw." (Taylor 159). Chopin translated eight of his works and through him developed her style of writing. She shared his concept of a hero : "An isolated world-weary and misanthropic hero who revels in his own sensuality; who trusts in nature and distrusts human relationships, especially love; who experiences a sense of liberation through solitary walks and confidences in his writing... and who is strongly drawn to death as a solution to the repetitive meaninglessness of life's pleasures. (Taylor 160) This was the basic outline for the plot of The Awakening . The book starts with Edna, a New Orleans high society wife and mother who was miserable with her